OThe conceptual model allowed them to go to C Level Contact List Lasso. But –we underline– the general trend assumed was that the votes went to Arauz or null, given what we know about the internal composition of Pérez's votes in the first round (more than a fifth of them came from Quito and the province of Azuay), and, above all, given the informed C Level Contact List intuitions we had in this regard. Azuay, traditionally a stronghold of Correismo and where Pérez had his best electoral performance in the first round of 2021, helps illustrate the argument more C Level Contact List clearly. Arauz obtained 21% in the first round, 23 points less than what Moreno achieved in 2017. The reasons are obvious: in
Azuay, Pérez obtained 42% (Hervas, by the C Level Contact List way, reached 15%), and Lasso achieved 14% (less than half of the 32% that it reached in 2017 in the same province). In other words, the votes of the strong bastion of Correismo in the southern C Level Contact List Sierra escaped Arauz in the direction of Pérez. In the absence of Pérez in the second round, Was it not reasonable to suppose that the majority of the partition of those Pérez votes –we C Level Contact List underline “majority”– would “return” to Correista inertia or would become null, as the Pachakutik candidate promoted? What was unreasonable, given Azuay's
Correista trajectory and the rest of the informed C Level Contact List intuitions, was to assume that in Pérez's absence, the majority of those votes would go to C Level Contact List Lasso. This is the intuitive explanation of the notion of "general trend" or "reasonable expectation." most of those votes would go to Lasso. This is the intuitive explanation of the notion of "general trend" or "reasonable expectation." most of those votes would go to Lasso. This is the intuitive C Level Contact List explanation of the notion of "general trend" or "reasonable expectation.